The Myth of Ex-Slave Turned Civil War Spy John Scobell
by Corey Recko
John Scobell shooting a Confederate pursuer in an illustration for Allan Pinkerton’s book The Spy of the Rebellion.
It was almost twenty years ago when I first learned of John Scobell. He is said to be a former slave who became a skilled spy while working under Allan Pinkerton in the American Civil War. History.com says of him, “Scobell completed a number of top-secret missions, often playing the part of a cook, field hand or butler to eavesdrop on Confederate officials. . . .” According to CIA.gov, “Scobell often worked with two of Pinkerton’s best agents—Timothy Webster and Carrie Lawton [Hattie Lewis]—posing as a servant.” I first heard of Scobell while reading Allan Pinkerton’s 1883 Civil War memoir The Spy of the Rebellion. While it was obvious, with its added dialogue, that the book wasn’t 100% factual, it was an entertaining read, and it left me with two men, besides Allan Pinkerton, that I wanted to learn more about. One was the talented spy Timothy Webster, whose life was cut short following the betrayal of fellow spies. I spent years researching Webster and wrote a biography (A Spy for the Union: The Life and Death of Timothy Webster) about this American hero. When I first read about Scobell, my hope was that I could write a book about him as well. Unfortunately, my research into Scobell didn’t produce the same results as my Timothy Webster research.
I began with secondary sources to find out what was already known about John Scobell. It wasn’t much. He is written about in plenty of books, but nothing adds to what Pinkerton wrote in 1883. Curiously, no mention was made of Scobell in David Horan’s The Pinkertons: The Detective Dynasty that Made History, a comprehensive history of the agency, nor does Scobell appear in Edwin Fishel’s very informative and detailed The Secret War for the Union: The Untold Story of Military Intelligence in the Civil War. Were confirmable details of Scobell’s life so scarce as to make them not worth mentioning? Was his story not as great as Pinkerton made it out to be? Or was he excluded from these books because there was no John Scobell? My answer would lie in the Papers of Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency and the Papers of George Brinton McClellan.
The records of Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency are very much incomplete for the 1850s and 1860s. Most were destroyed in the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. But some records did survive, including a few of Timothy Webster’s handwritten reports and Pinkerton’s account books from the Civil War years. The problem with searching the account books for John Scobell, if that was his real name, was that the account book entries are initials, and Pinkerton also employed John Scully at the time, so what I was looking for was payments and records that matched Scobell’s supposed activities as detailed in The Spy of the Rebellion. In this I came up empty. I found no record of him in any other records or correspondence, either. I was running out of sources, but I had one major source to go: The papers of General George B. McClellan, who Pinkerton reported to. These turned out to be a gold mine of information.
Included in McClellan’s papers are detailed reports from Allan Pinkerton. While they don’t include the operatives’ names (again using initials), they contain even minor details of their missions. While this was surely excessive and unneeded information for the busy General, for the author and historian reading them a century and a half later, these reports were wonderful. They were invaluable when writing my biography of Timothy Webster. My search for Scobell was less satisfying. He wasn’t there. I don’t just mean there wasn’t an operative named John Scobell, but there wasn’t an operative that did anything he was claimed to have done in The Spy of the Rebellion. There wasn’t a record of anyone going on the missions he was said to have undertaken, nor was there a record of anyone ever posing undercover as a servant for Timothy Webster or Hattie Lewis, as he was said to have done—not here or in any other account of Webster’s activities. Of those who recorded their contact with Timothy Webster, no mention was made of anyone who could have been John Scobell. It was true: John Scobell never existed. Whether he was added to The Spy of the Rebellion simply to sell books, or he was character Pinkerton created to pay tribute to the many runaway slaves who provided him with valuable information matters little. There was no John Scobell.
But, if John Scobell didn’t exist, why is he so often written about? A Google search for “john scobell civil war spy” produces 15,400 results, including first page results from some major news organizations and the CIA. That same search produces 5,870 results in Google Books. Since it’s no secret that Allan Pinkerton’s books are partly fictionalized and should never be taken as fact without corroboration, how did this happen? The problem isn’t that these books, articles, and websites used The Spy of the Rebellion as their only source (though, unfortunately, some of them did). The problem is many used a book that used that book as a source. Or used a book that used a book that used... you get the picture.
I have great admiration for Allan Pinkerton. He founded the most successful private detective agency ever at a time when it was needed for real law enforcement. He was an innovator in his field, an ardent abolitionist, fighter for Black rights, and he served his adopted country at a most desperate time. It is unfortunate that at the end of his life he so clouded the historical record, and it’s a shame how far the story of a man who never existed has spread.
Allan Pinkerton, 1861
Photograph taken at the Mathew Brady Studio
(Records of Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency, Library of Congress)
Cover of Allan Pinkerton’s 1883 book The Spy of the Rebellion
Corey Recko’s Homepage
© Corey Recko 2019